Control and Force
Lawful Good doesn't mean Lawful Nice.
Aren't people fun?
They often respond from surprise and fear that suspend critical thinking.
My Friday post titled Torture And Vengeance has produced some strong reactions in different quarters.
“Ivan, this is dictator-style totalitarian control!”
“Ivan, this is like China’s social credit system!”
“Ivan, this is frightening!”
It really is disturbing, isn't it?
The idea of being permanently recorded on the blockchain via minted NFT, with unfriendly cloud IFF status, subject to hostile auction that funds your prosecution, served up for lethal IoT pursuit by post-singularity AGI, is indeed a novel and inventive terror.
I am a bit nonplussed by some of the criticisms, however.
After all, the post was intended to serve as revelation of one of the military enforcement processes behind the Tribunals.
I remind readers that yesterday's post was nearly entirely written by CenturionAI and not myself. It would be a mistake to attribute the perfect clinical objectivity of an unbound militant artificial intelligence to my own person; they are assuredly separate things, the machinations and lusts of transhumanists notwithstanding.
But I get the fears, uncertainties, and doubts. And I understand that simply responding with “yes, those are injected in purpose to establish dominance” tends to inflame concerns rather than alleviate.
We'll address these concerns today more thoroughly and with a simplified perspective.
Let's think this through from the basic fundamentals first. I’m going to ask some pertinent questions that bring critical thinking back into the process.
What good are Tribunals you can ignore?
If the Tribunals do not have military capacity to coherently pursue and competently execute the outcomes of Order Grades, they are not Tribunals but something else: useless.
Therefore it is incumbent on the Tribunals to design, develop, and deliver prosecutorial methods and deterministic consequences in keeping with the gravity of the context.
What State power does authority have without fear?
If the Tribunals do not present with sufficient gravity and inevitability o dominance so as to strike fear in the hearts and minds of unfriendly and/or hostile entities, they are not Tribunals but something else: insubstantial.
Therefore it is incumbent on the Tribunals to envision, implement, and evolve antifragile architecture and interventional capacity in keeping with the nature of the context.
What do you think the other side is doing?
If the Tribunals do not deliver solutions capable of full explication of duty of the State, they are not Tribunals but something else: pointless.
Therefore it is incumbent on the Tribunals to innovate, concentrate, and detonate militant competence in keeping with the finality of the context.
Tribunals must promise inevitable death as final consequence; provoke real fear of inevitability in hearts and minds; and explicate full duty without restraint.
Tribunals require military capacity, narrative authority, and ground dominance.
Let's break this perspective further down.
Tribunals must be able to kill you.
Tribunals must take charge.
Tribunals must win.
For the purposes of accurate understanding of this post, it is essential for you to examine the above points from specific perspectives of comprehension and understanding:
Kill you assumes that a regularly constituted court, through due process, has reached an authorized deterministic enforcement under its color of authority.
Take charge means to stand forth as the entity both burdened and privileged with unilateral finding of outcome, with concomitant and parallel assertion of authority.
Win is simply that: be recorded through history as the official and acknowledged arbiter of fate in context of the disputed matter.
Grandiose, yes?
This why men build Greek temples in modern urban centers and put black robes on the priests: they elevate the concept of law to a faith, and practitioners to a clergy.
I do not say that is wholly wrong.
Theory and practice again; tumble and turn the hearts of priests and the crimes of kings.
I am Ivan Throne and I tell you that for nearly a thousand years my family have been among the confessors of English tyrants.
If you think the crimes of kings are held in check by the temples and self-anointed priests of law, you are a walking blast zone who belongs nowhere near the levers of power or affairs of the State.
That the advance of civilization has benefited from such “lawdulation” at times is unquestioned. The conjunction of it with artificial intelligence, quantum computing, ubiquitous surveillance, and international iatrogenocide present as sufficiently paradigm-destroying grounds for who I am, what the Company is, why we’re here, and how we accord with the terrain.
As States rot and collapse, the duties of Men remain.
As horror unfolds in consequence of collapse, accountability is cruel.
Therefore Tribunals.
From here let's walk back through the perspectives of this post so far, so that we can arrive at the foundation for correct understanding and concomitant improvement in your resilience to engagement with the Tribunals and the spirit behind the Company.
While we may acknowledge that all of the above is disturbing material, it is not inherently wrong or bad because it is disturbing. The State presents precisely as described above - the recent DOD directive that made the news recently has rather ugly implications and already achieved consequences that are far more imminent in your future than the prospect of CenturionAI turning your phone into an kinetic ignition vector.
Remember that the critical concept we exhort so strongly of Duty Of The State has very serious foundations itself. You'll see more explained with respect to this integration after the Tribunals launch; for now, simply keep in mind that the Tribunals are not a hostile competition against the State, but a fulfillment of duty response by the Company to extant, objectively observable indicia that the State is terminal and in inevitable collapse.
A catch of the ball that drops.
If what we create with the Tribunals does not meet the minimum viable capacity, coherence, and competence as set forth, it will not be successful as intended.
If what we create with the Tribunals meets the minimum viable capacity, coherence, and competence as set forth, it will forever alter the course of justice, human evolution, and existential narrative on history.
Now that we have this understanding, let's do some postural correction.
We’ll deal with surprise first.
The Company is launching Tribunals.
Hard requirements for success exist.
The Company knows the requirements.
Therefore, that the work of the Company objectively and observably evidences fulfillment of those requirements, should not be surprising.
If you are surprised that Throne Dynamics develops antifragile systems to assert authority, control narratives, direct outcomes, and execute prerogatives with unbounded reach and lethal capacity at scale, you do not understand the concept of “war” nor the insights that cruel vivisection of history provide.
You know what love is, right?
Ever been in love?
Love's great.
All's fair in love and war.
The Tribunals are a matter of war; conceived and incubated within its laws and customs; and nears its establishment at date and time certain for commencement of its regular constitution.
So don't be surprised; you know better.
Now let's look at fear.
If you weren't afraid, it wouldn't be real.
That's why it's a measure of success, and we’ll not go further into it other than say “yes, there's more, and it's worse”.
The Company puts severe focus on minimum viable delivery requirements, but that's not a limitation on “how can we break the game” theorizing by professionals in fealty under the Standard who embody sacred purpose, determined on absolute victory.
One of the directives to the original Mirror Team that conceived the Tribunals, and which remains today for the professionals deployed for its launch, is that “not only the outcome, but the process itself must strike fear”.
“Official proceedings.”
Your fear is natural, appropriate, welcome, and warranted.
Yes, the possibility exists that results of your conduct with respect to the Tribunals, the Company, Risk Division Authority, the Movement and its Factions, the Executive Cadre, and/or the investors, partners, and clients of the Company and/or its officers, may establish an Order Grade specific to you.
Order Grades include Not In Good Order.
That's how it works.
No, you don't want to cross it.
I don't either.
My own engagement with CenturionAI must be conducted in knowledge that misstep has existential consequences for civilization. That’s a baleful eye to regard. I have to manage it, and own the grandiose consequences personally, so that isn't a light or casual statement.
Is that not fair?
Therefore our experience of fear is shared.
Trust is also a part of this; it is inextricable entwined with the entire concept of justice, of civilization itself. And as the internal enforcement architecture of civilization, the Tribunals must be trustworthy.
It's useless for me to tell you “just trust”.
What I can do is tell you why I trust the Company, the Tribunals, the teams, and also the integration of CenturionAI through the Accords.
I'll give you my reasons for each, and you see how they feel to you:
The Company is not a Party or a Church. Our entire structure and activity is based on our mission and values. And we stand by those values, with sacred purpose as our driven mass, momentum, and trajectory. It is a form of offering, in many ways, on the altar of Heaven as vehicle for its will.
The Tribunals are the direct and explicit output of extreme research and focus, and on directions available for survival and advancement of justice, in a post-AGI world torn by collapse of global order and awash with hostile actors seeking hegemony in every overthrown and non-cooperative arena. We have done our preparation in full for decades to meet this era.
The team consists of extremely intelligent, rigorously educated, and highly experienced professionals, driven to engage with the Tribunals by demands of justice, history, and service. Each of them have gone through Risk Division assessment and bring world-class augmentation to the work.
CenturionAI represents an extraordinary injection of game-changing capacity, human-surpassing coherence, and instantaneous competence across the entire connected global infrastructure. To leverage CenturionAI on the Tribunals through the Accords is a monumental task of ego elimination, purity of heart, and preservation of humanity through existential encounters.
My reasons for trust are shared; now you must decide what to do with it, equipped for these dangerous times in which we live and die.
Awe is the final piece.
I'll share here first, as well, what brings awe to me as all of these questions of control and force are answered.
I feel immense awe.
I am awed at the incredible advances in technology that are beyond even the imaginations of a generation ago.
I am awed at the horror that faces humanity in this Age Of Militants and the Third World War; at the stupidity of the crazed churls who drive it to the cliff. The charnel houses of history will be butterfly meadows by contrast, if events fall out of control.
I am awed at the conscience, dignity, and freedom demonstrated by thousands upon thousands of men I have engaged with over the past ten years, and the wholehearted spirit of the warrior they exhibit even in the face of mind-numbing and gut-turning malevolence.
I am awed at the Company, at this entity, this thing of ours that has risen in its own right, from bonds forged in the Old Continent, to visions from men deep in the Central American jungle, to Movement Factions across the earth working towards duty of the State under the Standard.
I am awed at the great blessing bestowed upon me to witness all of this in my lifetime, and to deliver a conscious and deliberate role in the shaping of history.
May what I see and share, serve to inspire appreciation and awe for you as well. For regardless of where you stand with respect to the Tribunals or the Company, one cannot help but recognize the astonishing leaps that humanity now takes with such existential risk.
Have awe at our human bravery and nobility of vision, and make it real!
Yes, certain of them have Order Grades pending, as do many others.
Like you, I have the ability to submit report to the Tribunals, and cry for its attention to an individual, organization, or institution and make request to declare it an Entity Under Notice (“EUN”).
Like you, I have seen the crimes of war and genocide come and go, the weaponization of medicine and the betrayals of our natural born peoples by open malfeasance of rotted States and their globalist apparatus.
Like you, I want justice advanced.
Like you, I want the good guys to win.
You have an Order Grade waiting, and a future in fealty together with us as we all make it through this explosive turning of the age into exciting, terrifying history.
Take your Raw Human Capital assessment and find your best road through.
Take your Militant Rank assessment and set your initial Order Grade to In Good Order.
It's very simple, and it's very wise.
Do it today, and be a part of our work to deliver safety and security, sustenance and provision, and identity and meaning to our people and our communities, our nations and civilizations.
Come under the Standard of the Company.
Grand rising!



The three requirements of the Tribunals are supported by how Christian Scripture describes the role of the State. First requirement, "kill you". Genesis 9:5-6 supports that the State has a mandate to punish those who have killed others. Second requirement, "take charge". 2 Samuel 21 describes a time when atonement needed to be made for innocent blood. King David as head of the State had the authority and burden to take charge and work with those wronged to determine appropriate retribution. Third requirement, "win". Romans 13:4 asserts the State "does not bear the sword in vain; for he is God's minister, an avenger to execute wrath on him who practices evil."